Human Subjects Review Board

Home

History

Members
Meeting Schedule

 

Applications (Word Format)

Review of Research

Continuing Review

Course Required Research

Request for Exemption

 

Applications (PDF)

Review of Research

Continuing Review

Course Required Research

Request for Exemption

 

 

Other Links

 

Informed Consent

The Belmont Report

The Nuremberg Code

 

 

 

Mission Statement

The Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB) is the administrative and decision-making body having responsibility for review and approval of research involving human subjects.  Before any research involving human subjects can be initiated it must have received HSRB review and approval.

All Proposals should be sent directly to Steve Quackenbush, Chair of HSRB, via campus mail or e-mail (steven.quackenbush@maine.edu ).

Investigator Guidelines for Research that Includes Human Subjects

 

I.  Where Do I Begin?

 

UMF faculty, staff, and students who intend to conduct projects involving human participants must seek prospective approval (or an exemption) from the Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB).   Depending on the nature of your project, one of three scenarios will unfold:

 

1)    Your project is EXEMPT FROM FURTHER HSRB OVERSIGHT.    Exempt categories include (but are not limited to): (a) research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices (such as the systematic analysis of the efficacy of various instructional strategies) and (b) research involving surveys and interviews (unless the research is conducted in such a manner that human subjects can be identified or the survey/interview responses can potentially damage a participants financial standing, employability or reputation).  Additional exemptions are detailed on page 1 of the Request for Exemption form (Microsoft Word; PDF).    Only the HSRB can determine if a research project is exempt from further HSRB oversight.

 

·         If you believe that your project is exempt from further oversight, simply complete a Request for Exemption form (Microsoft Word; PDF).  As indicated on this form, your request should include (a) a brief description of your project, (b) a clear account of your “informed consent” procedures (including relevant documents), and (c) all survey and interview questions.   Note that the HSRB website includes sample “informed consent” forms that you can modify for use in your own study.   

·         You will receive feedback within 10 days regarding the status of your proposal.  If your project is indeed exempt, no further HSRB oversight is required.  If your project is not exempt, the review process may take longer (and the HSRB Chair may ask the investigator to submit a Request for HSRB Review form)

·         Note that any project dealing with sensitive information or special populations (as defined below), or presenting greater than minimal risk to participants, will require a full HSRB review.



2)    Your students are conducting a classroom project involving human subjects (where the purpose of the project is the education of individual students).     If you believe that your classroom project is exempt from monitoring by the HSRB, you should complete a Course Required Research form (Microsoft Word; PDF)    Such submissions will require review at a full HSRB meeting, so it is important to submit this form the semester prior to the initiation of the classroom project.   Once the project is approved, no subsequent review is required (unless there are changes in the course, the instructor, or the nature of the project).  [NOTE: ONLY THE HSRB CAN DETERMINE WHETHER STUDENT RESEARCH IS INDEED EXEMPT FROM HSRB MONITORING, AND INSTRUCTORS MUST SUBMIT A “COURSE REQUIRED RESEARCH” FORM IN ORDER TO EMPLOY HUMAN SUBJECTS IN CLASSROOM PROJECTS]

 

The following are examples of student research that may justify the submission of a Course Required Research form:

                                          i.    Student research that is not intended to produce "generalizable" information shared beyond the research class, and that does not include sensitive information, pose greater than minimal risk, or study a special population.

                                         ii.    Data collected in connection with a class that is undertaken for the purpose of learning research techniques, or professional skills (e.g., patient evaluations for nursing students, law student research techniques, student counseling techniques).

                                        iii.    Observation of students performed in commonly accepted educational settings provided the evaluator does not interact with the student (including observation of minors). Studies that focus on normal educational practices, curriculum, instructional techniques, or management strategies are exempt provided that the information is not shared beyond the UMF class or the research context.

                                       iv.    Analysis of existing data files in which subjects cannot be identified.

·         Note: If the results of the research will be disseminated to the general public, or if the project deals with sensitive information, involves interactions with “special populations” (defined below), or constitutes “risk” (of any sort) to the participants, the individual project requires HSRB oversight (and it is the instructor’s responsibility to bring the project to the attention of the HSRB Chair).

 

 

3)    Your project requires HSRB oversight.   If your project does not clearly fall into one of the categories noted above, you should submit a Request for HSRB Review (Microsoft Word; PDF).   Such research will be reviewed at the next full HSRB meeting.  All student submissions require the signature of a faculty sponsor.

 

 

II. What is the Process of HSRB Review?

 

A.  Initial HSRB Review

 

Material for HSRB review (or request for exemptions) should be delivered to the chair of the Internal Review Board (Steve Quackenbush) via campus mail or e-mail (steven.quackenbush@maine.edu).  If the submission is made via e-mail, the form can be signed by the principal investigator (or faculty sponsor) at the time the project is approved.    The HSRB chair will screen all applications to see if the project qualifies as  EXEMPT FROM FULL REVIEW (as defined above).  If the project does indeed require review, the HSRB may:

1.    Approve the research as submitted.

2.    Approve the research contingent upon specific revisions.

3.    Table the protocol for substantive changes.

4.    Disapprove the research.

5.    Suspend or terminate research that has not followed HSRB conditions of approval.

6.     Monitor the research for compliance with HSRB recommendations.

 

If the protocol is approved contingent upon minor revisions, the investigator must send a copy of the revised protocol to the HSRB Chair.

 


B.  Continuing Review Procedures

 

Federal Regulations require review of research at least annually, consequently the date of approval always begins form the date of review and extends at the maximum one year from the review date.

 

Protocol approval automatically expires at the end of the HSRB approval period.  If a researcher would like to continue research activities past the approval period, the research must submit a Request for Continuing Review (Microsoft Word; PDF)

 

 

C.  Report of Unforeseen and Adverse Events

All adverse events of physical or psychological harm, threats to privacy or safety of human subjects must be immediately communicated to the chair of the HSRB. 

 

 

 

IV.  Definitions

 

Research:  Research is defined as a systematic investigation designed to contribute to or develop "generalizable" knowledge (intended to be shared with the general public). This includes research obtained by an investigator through interaction or intervention with a human subject or any research on human subjects that includes identifiable private information. This does not include research in commonly accepted educational settings that does not generate information used beyond the institution (such as course evaluations) unless the subjects can be identified and the information obtained poses a risk to the subject greater than that encountered in daily life.   [Note: Only the HSRB can determine whether a given project is appropriately classified as “research”]

 

Minimal Risk: Risk that is not greater than that encountered in every-day life.

 

Sensitive Information: Includes information that may pose a risk to the subject: psychological, social, medical, legal, economic or quality of life. The following categories exemplify these risks.

 

Categories of Sensitive Information:

 

1.    Information relating to sexual attitudes, preferences, or practices.

2.    Information relating to the use of alcohol, drugs or other addictive products.

3.    Information pertaining to illegal conduct.

4.    Information that if released could reasonably damage an individual's financial standing, employability, or reputation within the community.

5.    Information that would normally be recorded in a patient's medical record and the disclosure of which could reasonably lead to social stigmatization or discrimination.

6.    Information pertaining to an individual's psychological well-being or mental health.

7.    Genetic information

 

 

Special subject populations: Certain populations have additional protections under the Common Rule. Studies that include special subject populations must follow a more rigorous review by the HSRB. (Researchers are reminded that USM policies have been written to comply with the Federal Rules that provide additional protection for these populations.)

 

Subject populations with added protections:

 

1.    Minors (under 18 years)

2.    Pregnant women

3.    Fetuses or products of labor and delivery

4.    Prisoners

  1. Individuals with a diminished capacity to give informed consent

For more information visit the Office for Human Subjects Research Protection Website at www.hhs.gov/ohrp/